Monday, December 25, 2006

The War Against Islam

I missed the event, but I read about it. Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of North America's annual convention at the Dearborn Hyatt Regency was held this past weekend. The Detroit Free Press ran a few articles on it. Today's was on bullying - no, not how to, but how to avoid it and deal with it, you know, because infidels sometimes will drive their SUVs into crowds of Muslims. And we must not forget about crazy infidels with guns who shoot Muslims at ramdom, or break into Muslim community centers with guns and start murdering female employees. And then there are the various anti-Muslim terror plots that (thank God) have been broken up before they've come to fruition. The first article about the conference was a short matter-of-fact statment advertising the event. In the second article, from the 23rd, the conference is given a large build up. One might also say it's another advertisement. But no article about Muslims would be complete without outrageous comments designed to make Muslims into victims:
"No other community is being challenged more right now than the Muslim community," Khalilah Sabra, 39, of Raleigh, N.C., said Friday. "If this is a melting pot, why are we not allowed in the pot?"
My, how sad.

I have friends who attend Henry Ford Community College in Dearborn Michigan who regularly get bullied by those who are "not allowed in the pot".

Michelle Malkin had some reports on a few notorious melting pot rejects:
What ever happened to Naveed Avzal Haq?

He was the Pakistani-American gunman who burst into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle building in late July, shooting six women, one fatally, as he declared that he was a "Muslim-American" who was "angry at Israel." This week, citing Haq's history of mental illness, King County prosecutor Norm Maleng announced he woudn't seek the death penalty--despite calling the shooting "one of the most serious crimes that has ever occurred in this city." Readers at leading Northwest blog Sound Politics react:

Makes you wonder what kind of heinous crime will get the death penalty in this state from now on. Seems it's all but eliminated here. Posted by: Palouse on December 20, 2006 11:02 AM

So the lesson to the Jihadist or wanna-be jihadist is prior to performing a terrorist act make sure you have received mental health care within the past few years or more recently if possible and then after you get caught claim insanity get life in prison and while in prison "get better" and have your lawyer work with the states DOC and to get you out under "DOC Supervison" for "good behavior". Rinse and repeat and there you go you no longer have to worry about being a martyr. Posted by: TrueSoldier on December 20, 2006 11:45 AM
What ever happened to Omeed Aziz Popal and his victims?

He was the San Francisco SUV hit-and-run rampager, accused of killing one person and injuring 18 in August. Earlier this month, he pleaded not guilty.

A reader sent this stomach-turning development in which Popal's parents are blaming one of the victims for her debilitating injuries:

The family of a man accused of deliberately running down pedestrians with his SUV don't think they should have to pay for one of the victim's medical bills.

Susan Rajic remains a quadriplegic three months after she was hit while walking in San Francisco. Omeed Popal is in jail charged with hitting Rajic and 17 other people in the City. He's also accused of murdering a pedestrian in the East Bay the same day.

KRON 4 obtained a copy of the Popal family's response to Rajic's lawsuit asking for medical bills. The defendants blame Rajic saying she was "careless and negligent." The response also says it was "within her power to act with due diligence to prevent her injuries."

"It is heartless," Rajic's attorney Debra Bogaards told KRON 4's Will Tran. "It is unfair. It is unjust. It is unbelievable."

My reader writes:

Susan is still paralyzed from the neck down, and has only recently regained the ability to breathe on her own without a ventilator. Her reward for being a "careless and negligent" victim, and failing to "act with due diligence" to prevent Mr. Popal from running over her in his parent's SUV (along with 17 other individuals, allegedly), is the loss of her livelihood, not to mention mounting medical bills covering her treatment and rehabilitation.


Once Susan has completed her rehabilitation, Joseph would like to transfer her to his home in Georgia, so he can care for her and provide for her ongoing medical care. Unfortunately, Susan has no health insurance, and Joseph does not have the means to cover the costs for her relocation and ongoing treatment.

There is a website to help Susan and her family at

Please help.
So the message here, as always, is that Muslims, no matter how vicious they are to non-Muslims are always the victim. They cannot be punished. That would be anti-Islamic, racist, Islamophobic, an insult to Islam, etc.

The plan is: if CAIR and other Muslim pressure groups are loud enough in their cries of Islamic victimhood, maybe the infidel citizenry of this country won't notice that they are the victims of Islamic hate. If you read the comments in the bullying article though, you'll notice that some American infidels object to being dhimmis and are rejecting claims of Muslim victimhood, . . . until it degenerates into namecalling and general stupidity. The Free Press, like the rest of the MSM though, in its morally bankrupt quest to be "evenhanded" gives too much credence to to phony Muslim claims and accepts its dhimmi status.



Post a Comment

<< Home

<< List
Jewish Bloggers
Join >>
War's legitimate object is more perfect peace. Flavius Vegitius Renatus This is an optional footer. If you want text here, place it inside these tags, and remove this comment.